|
Court finds Bossman’s a nuisance By SUE WATSON Staff Writer Bossman’s
Barbecue is officially closed. The case that has lingered on the court
dockets for nearly nine months was heard last week in circuit court
before Judge Henry Lackey. In presenting a
summary of the findings, the court revoked James Milan’s license to
serve beer and declared his establishment on Jamison Road a public
nuisance. In his remarks, Lackey said Milan had
been on notice since April 2007 when the lawsuit was filed and had
plenty of time to set matters straight. “If he
(Milan) intended to clean up his act and to abide by the law, he has
had almost a year to do that,” Lackey said. “But it seems the problems
have accelerated with the shooting of an 18-year-old outside the
barbecue place, then we have one fellow who lost his life in the
establishment (January 20 of this year). There’s no question in the
court’s mind there is illegal liquor (hard liquor) being sold and
certainly no question there’s illegal gambling.” In
stronger words, Lackey said the operations at the club “make a mockery
of our law,” that the barbecue place has a “gambling room.” And the
security personnel there were carrying weapons. “That’s a dangerous
situation, particularly when alcohol is being served,” he said. People had complained about problems at the club. “Mr.
Milan knew about it and apparently he did not take the necessary
steps,” Lackey said. “The court has no choice but to agree with the
motion (before the court) to find it (the club) a nuisance. “Sheriff
Dickerson and his staff do not have time to babysit or oversee to
assure his establishment is in compliance with the law and neither does
this court.” Lackey’s order and declaration
followed two half-days of testimony in which the plaintiffs (Marshall
County Board of Supervisors and the District Attorney’s office) called
12 witnesses and the defense called four. Witnesses
for the plaintiffs testified hard liquor was bootlegged at the club,
that a “gambling room” (dice table) was in operation there, that there
was underage drinking, that marijuana smoke was present on the premises
at times, that shots were heard in the vicinity of the club, that
sometimes arguments broke out there, and that the club produced
excessive noise and patrons partially blocked the road at times with
their vehicles. Witnesses stated that there had
been a shooting at the club in September. A man was clobbered over the
head with a beer bottle in December. Then three
people were shot, one lethally, on January 20, inside the club. The
owner, James Milan was shot and his son, Rodrick, was shot and
paralyzed, witnesses said. Sheriff Kenny
Dickerson testified the board of supervisors executed a license for
beer to be sold at the establishment in the fall of 2006, and that soon
afterward problems were being reported to his department and affidavits
signed. The complaints included that alcohol was
being sold to minors, loud music was a disturbance to the neighborhood,
that disorderly conduct took place at the club and illegal gambling was
taking place. He said the vast majority of complaints came from older people reluctant to come forward and testify in court. Milan’s
attorney, Collier Carlton, called four witnesses for the defense,
Anthony Warren Fleming Sr. of Memphis, who described what the saw at
the January 20 shooting at the club. On prior
visits he never heard shots fired, saw the road blocked, any gambling
or underage drinking, sale of hard liquor or marijuana use, he said. Fleming said he did not think the place was a nuisance or unsafe. “You
have bad people wherever you go,” he said. “To me his (Curtis Montreal
Davis’, the deceased) mind was made up. That was his goal to come in
there ...(and shoot someone).” Fleming testified he had placed small bets on dice. Another
defense witness, James Walker Jr., of Chulahoma, testified like Fleming
that the club was safe when he was there and he saw no fights or
arguments or sale of hard liquor. On cross examination, Walker said he had shot dice at the club and also had cooked for Milan. Lee
E. Falkner, a Jamison Road resident called by the defense, testified he
did not believe the club to be a nuisance. He had heard shots fired
outside the area, seen the road partly blocked at times and knew of
some after-hours gambling for money. The club did ask for
identification cards and the owner had tried to stop patrons from
bringing marijuana. He had seen two fistfights. It was the deceased, Curtis Montreal Davis, who hit him in the head with a beer bottle without any provocation, he said. Attorney for the plaintiffs, Kent Smith called the last witness, James Milan. Milan denied selling bootlegged liquor and said he had a valid license to serve food. Smith then presented evidence - a letter to Milan from the Health Department - saying Milan had no license to serve food. He
testified there was no security at the club at times, that marijuana
smoking was not allowed at the club, and that he neigher sold or had
any half-pint whiskey at the club. Smith asked Milan about the dice shooting for money. “It’s true,” said Milan. In
summary remarks, Smith cited the testimony of illegal gambling, of the
illegal sale of hard liquor, and the shootings at the establishment as
good reasons for declaring the club a nuisance to the community. Pointing
at Milan, he said, “That man’s son got shot and probably will suffer
the rest of his life and he’s up here acting like his club is not a
danger to that community.” In summary statements,
defense attorney Carlton, suggested the court had several options at
its disposal: revoke Milan’s beer license, suspend his license for a
time or to require Milan post bond to abate nuisance. He said the January 20 shooting was spurred on by a person who came out there to cause trouble. “He
(Curtis Montreal Davis) is the one who came in there cowboy-style and
shoots Mr. Milan’s son and Mr. Milan himself,” Carlton said. “Mr.
Milan admits to shooting small dice. People want to complain
anonymously but with no real evidence of loud music. We had two people
who testified it is safe and who had no objections. We feel the court
should consider bond or a temporary suspension of license.”
|