|
The Preacher’s Corner By Rev. Dr. Milton Winter The Baptist, Episcopal, Methodist and Presbyterian churches... Last
week a young researcher from Arkansas visited Holly Springs to follow
up on earlier conversations I had had with him about Gipsy Smith, the
famous evangelist of the 1920s. Well, I know a good bit, and told him
about his famous revival service here in 1926. Here
is an answer to my young friend’s questions about Gipsy Smith and his
Holly Springs revival by means of this column, and if you are
interested you can read along too. It is quite a tale. Gipsy
Smith, the colorful revivalist, preached in Holly Springs in June 1926.
Dr. George L. Bitzer, pastor of the Presbyterian Church had persuaded
Smith to come. A strong believer in interchurch cooperation, Bitzer had
a remarkable ability to bring fellow ministers and neighbor
congregations together for projects. The Baptist,
Episcopal, Methodist, and Presbyterian churches agreed to consolidate
their Sunday morning and evening services in favor of the evangelistic
campaign. It was the first time in the history of Holly Springs that
all four of the principal white Protestant churches had joined together
for a preaching mission. Services were held twice
on Sundays and each weeknight in a large tent on the Holly Springs High
School grounds. The city was divided into eight districts, with cottage
prayer meetings in each. A large meeting for men was held in the movie
theater. Businesses closed early so employees could attend. (Closing
early on Saturday night must have been a sacrifice for merchants on the
square then.) The effort was continued for three
weeks. Of course, seating was segregated, but Gipsy Smith broke new
ground when he insisted that black worshipers be invited and welcomed,
even if they had to sit in their own sections. (It remained for Billy
Graham in the 1950s to insist on open seating, with the result that
many whites in the South did not support his work.) The Gipsy Smith
meetings, while not integrated, represented one of the first occasions
since the Civil War when black and white worshiped together across the
South in any significant way. Smith also spoke against the abuse of
liquor and opposed corruption in public officials. In
the second week of the meeting The South Reporter declared “Sunday
night’s crowd the largest assembled since the opening of the revival.”
The congregation in the tent was augmented by many out of town
visitors. The deportment of worship ers was reverent and the preacher’s
demeanor without “ranting or hysterical appeal.” Near the end of the
campaign, a special train brought a 1,000 people from Water Valley to
hear Gipsy Smith. He was paid with a freewill offering. The crowds
looked forward to Smith’s traditional closing sermon, “From Gipsy Camp
to Pulpit,” in which he gave the story of his life and conversion. Rodney
“Gipsy” Smith owed his popularity to at least two facts besides his
dramatic talent. He was a converted gipsy and he was an Englishman. His
father and two uncles were active evangelists in the British Isles. He
had been converted at the age of 16, and from 1877 to 1882, had worked
with William Booth, preaching on street corners and mission halls for
the Salvation Army. By 1936 he had conducted 33 revival tours in the
United States. Smith was part of that evangelistic movement which
followed upon the work of the highly successful D.L. Moody. Among their
number were Campbell Morgan, Billy Sunday, and later, Billy Graham. One
may be surprised that at least two denominations supported such an
effort — the Episcopal and Presbyterian — both churches that today are
thought of as decidedly “un-revivalistic.” The explanation is not that
these denominations were once more “conservative.” Rather, it is that
evangelists such as Gipsy Smith were so thoroughly positive in their
appeal that all could support his efforts. To me this stands in
contrast to the “culture wars” preaching of modern evangelists. More
than this, Dr. Bitzer was a progressive in his day—his writings gained
national attention. He and his colleagues in the other Holly Springs
Churches real ized they had much in common, and so they worked together. There
is so much in Jesus Christ that is inviting. What the church today
needs is leaders who can focus on this, and I believe that if we could,
some of our relig ious disagreements would sort themselves out.
|