|
Letters To The Editor Needs love, care To whom it may concern: About
eight weeks ago on Bubba Taylor Rd., near Gravel Pit Rd., you dumped
your little black mama dog, with a litter of three or four black
puppies, maybe 6 weeks old at that time. I want to give a good
description, so you will know who you are.
One male puppy
survived. The mama dog was hungry all the time, but feared people. She
died because, in looking for food, her head became lodged in a plastic
jug. It took eight long days for her to die. Every person in our
neighborhood who saw her tried to help her. She was so fearful we
couldn’t catch her. She died inches from food and water. Every
time I think of her my heart breaks. If she had been spayed, all of
this would not have happened. Even with puppies, a responsible pet
owner would have done the right thing. Please do not take a pet
if you are not going to care for it, and don’t leave it to your
children. Children are not responsible for themselves; how can they
care for a pet without parental supervision? I have three
throw-away pets in my home. I don’t have room for this puppy. He is
very smart. He is solid black with a white patch on his chest, friendly
and sweet. He needs someone responsible to love and care for him. Call
the Marshall County Humane Society (564-2900). Donna Boswell Byhalia Redistricting plan Dear Editor, Every
10 years, the legislature redraws the boundaries of voting districts.
The party in power always draws the districts in such a way as to
improve its chances in future elections. The other party always cries
foul and cloaks itself in self-righteous indignation. This “Decennial
Dance” is complicated by the chaperoning of the U.S. Department of
Justice; which, depending on the party in control in Washington, may
have its own political interests to serve. A front page story in
the 10 May edition of The South Reporter laments the fact that our
Senate district has been redrawn in the proposed plan. The problems
seem to be that we might not be able to get so much stuff from Jackson,
and that black voting blocks might be diluted. We have three issues
here: 1) getting stuff, 2) racial division, and 3) gerrymandering in
general. We are fast becoming a society of beggars; and the sad
fact is that we are begging for our own money. When we send money to
Washington or Jackson and then go hat in hand to get some of it back,
what has been accomplished — other than providing employment for
bureaucrats who decide who gets back how much of the money we send
them? We have people making a living as lobbyists representing the
cities and counties of Mississippi. What is their purpose other than
trying to get back some of the money we’ve unnecessarily sent to
Jackson? We have people making a living writing requests for grants. If
we paid our way locally we wouldn’t have to send so much to Washington
and Jackson, and the people who make a living to get us something for
“nothing” would have to find productive rather than parasitic
employment. The farther a problem solver is from the problem, the less
likely he is to solve the problem. Shouldn’t we be keeping the money
and the decision-making at home? The second issue raised by the
May 10 article was racial division. Isn’t it time to get rid of the
Voting Rights Act and the meddling of the U.S. Department of Justice in
Southern elections? There are very few people alive today who can
remember the Jim Crow voting laws. There is election fraud in the
South, but no more than in the North; and in the South, no more in
white majority districts than in black majority districts. So long as
we are afflicted with ambitious people, we will be afflicted with
election fraud. The object is to reduce it as much as possible. The
Voting Rights Act does nothing to reduce such fraud; in fact, the
present Attorney General’s selective enforcement policies make things
worse, not better. It is time to get rid of the Voting Rights Act. In
the early 19th century a Massachusetts governor by the name of Gerry
had the voting districts in his state redrawn to favor his party. One
of the districts was so ridiculously drawn that on a map it looked like
a salamander. Ever since, drawing such districts has been known as
gerrymandering. Politicians gerrymander voting districts for their own
personal political advantage. They also claim to gerrymander for racial
reasons. Does gerrymandering our own voting districts to provide some
majority black and some majority white districts heal racial divisions,
or does it tend to pick the scabs off healing wounds? Gerrymandering
districts does little to promote the appearance of good government, but
it does serve the interests of the party doing the drawing, and so long
as parties can gerrymander districts, they will gerrymander districts. The
solution is a Constitutional Amendment requiring all districts to be
squares or rectangles with four right angles in the boundaries of each
district. The one exception to this rule would be districts on the
boundary between states when that boundary is not a straight line
(river, coastline). This would put an end to the Decennial Dance and
both parties would have to live with voting populations distributed by
the voters’ choices of residence rather than the politicians’
creativity in boundary drawing. Very truly yours, J.R. Dunworth |