|
Board supports mayor on bill dispute By SUE WATSON Staff Writer  | Photo by Sue Watson
Ed
Watson with Acme Brick voices concerns to the city board. In back (from
left) are Garrie Colhoun, Belinda McDonald and Ki Jones. |
The
Holly Springs Board of Aldermen stood behind the mayor in a dispute
over collection of a delinquent gas bill from Acme Brick. Ed
Watson with Acme argued with the mayor and board at a recent meeting
that his company had been treated wrongly over a natural gas bill
dispute. Acme bought the brick plant in 2001
and tried to negotiate a better price for gas with Holly Springs
Utility Department, he said. The company closed the plant in 2008 after
terminating most of its employees, except four who remain to operate
the facility as a sales and distribution center, primarily to supply
brick to the Memphis market, Watson said. He said
Acme had an issue with HSUD about additional charges for natural gas
which his company believed were outside the contract it had with the
city and refused to pay it. Acme paid its bill except for about $26,000
but is still being billed for it. Recently HSUD tried to collect the
unpaid balance for gas by transferring the natural gas charges to the
electric side of the bill, Watson said, and repeatedly disconnecting
the electricity. Mayor Andre’ DeBerry said he
got calls from Acme on each occasion the electricity was disconnected
and ordered the service turned back on. The
$26,000 billed for gas was transferred to the electric side in November
2011, Watson said, and the bill that usually ran at $400 for
electricity contained the charges for the disputed gas bill. Watson
said DeBerry intervened in January this year when HSUD threatened to
pull the electricity and that the same thing happened in February this
year and the mayor intervened again. Then in April HSUD pulled the
meter and Acme operated off a generator until DeBerry restored power. Watson
said Acme wonders if it is welcome in the city. It closed 10 plants,
which included the brick manufacturing operations in Holly Springs,
when the housing construction market collapsed in the late 2000s.
Watson said when the economy recovers it will reopen some of the closed
facilities but questions whether it will include starting production
back in Holly Springs. He said Acme does not want to litigate but will not pay the gas charges and does not want to be “harassed continually.” DeBerry
replied that about 60 percent of the current board was not elected when
the dispute over the gas charges began. He said he believes HSUD should
resolve disputes in “ways professional and treat business and
industries with a degree of respect.” “We try to do that,” he said. DeBerry
said that transfer of unpaid balances from one department to the other
within HSUD should be authorized by the board of aldermen. He said the
point of contention came since 2001. “To put
industry in jeopardy – industries come in and create jobs, it’s a
little different than a residential customer,” he said. He said Acme may come back online with production and the city needs jobs. “At
some point this needs to be dealt with,” he said. “I think it is
disrespect to the executive officer (himself) to keep having to do it
(order HSUD to turn power back on). “It puts us
in a bad light. This thing needs to be resolved. A shell game is not a
good way to do business. The board needs to move. Eleven years and we
still have this issue. At some point in time, we need to get off square
one.” He said the mayor has no authority to relieve debt or transfer debt; the board has the authority. Alderman Johnnie Bagley-Johnson asked who made the contract with Acme. Watson said the contract with the city was transferred with the purchase of the plant. Board
attorney Ki Jones advised that the board may need to take the matter
under advisement while past involvements with ACME’s attorneys are
looked at. He said the dispute needs to be resolved. Watson agreed. “The
transfer of debt is what we are trying to resolve,” said DeBerry. “The
board needs to address this point of transfer of debt.” Alderman Russell Johnson motioned to remove the gas debt from the electric bill. Alderman
Calvin James asked how long it had been since gas supply had been
turned off. Watson said it had been cut off three years then the city
transferred the debt to the electric side. HSUD
general manager Don Hollingsworth said the reason the account was
transferred to the electric side is that all accounts are worked
through the electric department. He cited PURPA (Public Utility
Regulatory Policies Act) laws. “If I have (HSUD has) an account with you, I cannot write off $26,000 and keep power going,” he said. “It’s a TVA law.” Hollingsworth
said the utility found it was not charging the transportation fee from
Tennessee Gas to Acme and added that to the bill after the fact and
Acme disagreed with that. “You were getting 40
cents charged when 51 cents was what Tennessee was charging us to meter
from the station to the city. So the city was losing 11 cents,”
Hollingsworth said. He said the contract with Acme allows the city to collect the transportation cost. “That is all there is to it,” Hollingsworth said. Watson said the contract stated they would be charged 40 cents per unit for transportation. “That’s inside the city,” Hollingsworth said. “We saw our misgiving and made an effort to abide by it.” DeBerry argued that transferring the bill for gas to the electric side was bad accounting. Dee
Miller, in accounting with HSUD, said the electric department collects
all the utility bills and then pays each department its portion. “We have to collect it because the electric department has already charged it to the gas department,” she said. Johnson
restated his motion to discontinue to allow debt in one utility
department side to be transferred to another. James seconded the motion
and it passed by a unanimous vote of the board. Afterward Watson and the board agreed to settle the gas bill dispute without litigation at a later meeting with city leaders.
|