|
• Wicker co-sponsors balanced budget amendment Real reform involves permanent check on spending U.S. Senator Roger F. Wicker The
national debt topped $15 trillion earlier this month – an alarming
figure unprecedented in our nation’s history. Our government’s debt has
eclipsed the size of the entire U.S. economy, and Americans are right
to be concerned. In fact, the federal debt has
increased more rapidly under President Obama’s watch than any other
U.S. president’s. The federal government is borrowing a staggering 43
cents of every dollar we spend. Like any crisis, fixing the problem
will take more than dealing with the damage that has been done. Serious
reform should be preventive – with measures that put a permanent check
on Washington’s overspending. A Constitutional Answer The
Budget Control Act, which passed this summer, requires Congress to vote
on a balanced-budget amendment to the Constitution before the end of
the year. A number of versions have emerged, including one recently
considered by the House of Representatives. The Senate is likely to
vote on its own version soon. Unlike the House
measure, the amendment supported by all 47 Senate Republicans puts
strict limits on federal spending power and makes it harder for
Congress to raise taxes. It would cap annual spending at the historical
average for revenues – 18 percent of the country’s gross domestic
product (GDP) – and require a supermajority vote in both the House and
Senate before taxes could be increased or the debt ceiling raised. Under
such an amendment, there would be no room for the reckless use of
taxpayer money. As former Congressional Budget Office director Douglas
Holtz-Eakin wrote recently for National Review, “Constraint is not a
policy cost; it is a policy benefit.” In essence, spending limits will
result in smarter spending. Demand for Accountability Families
across the country make sacrifices every day to live within their means
in today’s tough economy. Most states – including Mississippi – have
balanced-budget requirements. It is not unreasonable to demand the
federal government do the same. The call for a
constitutional requirement is neither new nor lacking in bipartisan
appeal. Not long after I was elected to Congress in 1994, a
balanced-budget amendment passed with 300 votes in the House before
falling short by one vote in the Senate. The national debt has tripled
in size since then. The majority of Americans are
ready for serious change that will rein in Washington’s out-of-control
spending and put confidence back in the market. According to a CNN/ORC
International poll in July, nearly three in four Americans want a
balanced-budget amendment to pass. Looking Long-Term Simply
put, we cannot keep spending money we do not have. According to
economists, excessive debt brings down economic growth and hurts job
creation. The current financial crisis in Europe is a troubling case in
point. The failed bipartisan supercommittee’s
recent inaction will result in automatic cuts, much of which will fall
on our nation’s defense. We can do better on
behalf of future generations by implementing long-term reform that
protects national security and prevents years of overspending from
happening again. I remain committed to making the tough decisions we
need to put America’s fiscal house back in order. We can start by
passing the Senate’s balanced-budget amendment and sending it to the
states for ratification.
|