Ballot issues surface By BARRY BURLESON Editor Last
week issues arose over the wording of the statewide initiatives being
offered for vote on the November 8 ballot. There was an announcement
that many counties would have to reprint ballots or add “inserts” after
absentee voting has already begun. Attorney
General Jim Hood said he believed the “fiscal analysis” or cost to
taxpayers for each of the initiatives should have been included on the
ballots, according to the state Constitution. Secretary of State
Delbert Hosemann, after reviewing applicable statutes, agreed. “Pursuant
to code section 23-15-367, it is the responsibility of the secretary of
state to prepare the ballot and the governor to approve it,” Hood said.
“Luckily, one of our career election lawyers was reviewing another
matter and discovered that the secretary of state had failed to place
the fiscal analysis on the initiative as is expressly required by the
Constitution (Section 273). Our assistant attorney general immediately
called the secretary of state’s office to notify them of their error.” The
fiscal analysis for each initiative was prepared by the legislative
budget office. That office found there was no financial impact for the
personhood and eminent domain initiatives and a $1,499,000 financial
impact for the voter identification initiative. For
personhood and eminent domain, the additional wording will read –
“There is no determinable cost or revenue impact associated with this
initiative.” For voter ID, the fiscal analysis on
the ballot will read: “Based on Fiscal Year 2010 information, the
Department of Public Safety issued 107,094 photo IDs to U.S. citizens
of voting age. The individuals were assessed $14 per ID to offset a
portion of the $17.92 cost per ID. The cost is estimated to remain the
same, but the assessment will no longer be allowable under the
provision of Initiative 27 (voter ID). Therefore, the Department of
Public Safety is estimated to see a loss of revenue of approximately
$1,499,000.” Hosemann said, “Our office has taken
great strides to educate the public on these three initiatives. State
law required we hold five public hearings across the state on the
initiatives; our agency held nine. Those hearings were transcribed and
placed on our website, along with written comments submitted to our
agency, at www.sos.ms.gov/elections/initiatives. I encourage the public
to take the time to read these discussions and be informed on the
issues before they head to the polls on November 8.” The
secretary of state’s office published the original statewide ballot to
individual counties on September 14, and most circuit clerks, including
Lucy Carpenter in Marshall County, had already developed their ballots
and had begun absentee balloting. Pamela Weaver,
director of communications with the secretary of state’s office, said
absentee votes cast up until the change will count and the secretary of
state’s office will pay the counties’ extra printing expenses. She said
she did not know how many counties would have to reprint, how much it
would cost or whether some would simply add inserts. Inserts are being
added on absentee ballots, she said. Carpenter said she will not have ballots reprinted. “I have a real issue with that as tight as money is now,” she said. “It could be handled another way.” She
said she will use the new data base to change the voting machines so
the new language will be added to the initiatives. Plus, there will be
“an insert” added to the paper ballots for absentee, affidavit and
curbside voting, according to Carpenter. |