Higher premiums signal flawed health-care reform U.S. Senator Roger F. Wicker The
promises of the U.S. President’s health-care law continue to unravel as
the costs of its harmful mandates become more and more apparent. The
latest study by the nonpartisan Kaiser Family Foundation reveals that
premiums for employer-backed insurance have jumped dramatically this
year – by 8 percent for individuals and 9 percent for families. During
his campaign, President Obama assured voters that he would reduce the
cost of health-care premiums by an average of $2,500 per family.
Instead, premiums have grown by nearly that much since he was elected –
at a rate that far exceeds wage increases and inflation. The
gap between rhetoric and reality has not changed. The President
recently proposed paying for a portion of his new $447 billion jobs
bill by altering Medicare’s prescription drug program. Douglas
Holtz-Eakin, former director of the Congressional Budget Office, says
the changes would increase drug costs and push up monthly premiums by
as much as 40 percent for millions of seniors. More Cost, Less Coverage According
to Kaiser President Drew Altman, the study illustrates “a quiet
revolution going on in what we call health insurance in this country.”
He says insurance is becoming less comprehensive and is likely to stay
that way. The president made a pledge to
Americans that they could keep their current health-care plans, but
this promise is no longer viable. The higher costs triggered by onerous
mandates have eroded the options available. Kaiser’s report shows that
only about half of the workers surveyed had the same insurance as they
did before the health-care plan became law. Of course, estimates done
by the Obama Administration did not foresee such an accelerated change. Far-Reaching Consequences Americans
are right to be concerned about having to pay more for health care.
These rising premiums are particularly painful and far-reaching in a
weak economy. For the first time, half of workers at small firms have
annual deductibles topping $1,000 on individual policies. The
changing landscape extends to employers’ role as an insurance
provider. About half of Americans currently get their insurance from
employer-backed health-care plans. This year’s surging costs present
employers with tough options: Shift more of the burden to workers or
drop coverage altogether. More small businesses – the prime drivers of
job creation – are choosing the latter. Those that shoulder the rising
costs may be too cash-strapped to hire or expand. The result is lost
economic competitiveness, bigger government, and a greater strain on
taxpayers. Need for a New Approach I
voted against the president’s health-care bill last year, and I voted
to repeal the law this year. The evidence continues to mount that we
need a new approach – one that offers practical, cost-efficient
solutions driven by market competition. Provisions
such as the law’s financially unsustainable Community Living Assistance
Services and Supports Program, or “CLASS Act,” have been deemed
unworkable even by the administration. President
Obama’s policymakers have already granted more than a thousand waivers
to states, labor unions, and companies because the new rules are too
costly to bear. The Supreme Court is likely to get involved within the
next year regarding the law’s constitutionality. Rising premiums are one of many indicators that the president’s health-care plan is taking us in the wrong direction. Instead
of continuing to implement the flawed law, we should work to give
Americans the affordable, high-quality health care they deserve. |