Mayor seeks support of projects By SUE WATSON Staff Writer Holly
Springs Mayor Andre’ DeBerry asked the board of aldermen for support of
a progressive investment and development capital plan at the September
20 meeting. He said long-standing problems in the
city’s infrastructure not only should be solved from the standpoint of
safety and risk exposure, but also to help make the city attractive for
local citizenry and for potential industrial and business growth. His
plan, prepared by the consulting law firm Watkins Ludlum Winter &
Stennis, calls for a 1 cent on the dollar sales tax to raise $8 million
in revenue for a variety of projects, and another $13.21 million in
street improvements and sidewalks. He proposed to phase in the street
improvement projects and to pay for them with general obligation bonds,
utility bonds and/or special assessment bonds. The mayor said a
combination of bonding mechanisms could be used if more than one is
needed, and possibly all three, to pay off the street projects. The
board and mayor engaged in an in-depth discussion of the advisability
of this strategy to spur economic development and also the timing.
DeBerry argued the proposed projects would take years to get to the
“trigger point” where there would be no going back. In the meantime
costs of capital improvements are escalating and getting projects
through the process can take years. Some of the salient points of discussion follow: •
The mayor said the city has tried to address improvements in the city
piecemeal out of necessity and his proposal would not dip into the
city’s operating budget. It would pay for large equipment and facility
outlays in the $8 million that would be paid for by a local and private
bill, an approach that would take several years at best to put into
action. The city already has a local and private bill that allows the
city to collect 2 cents on every dollar in sales tax to pay off the
loan on the multi-purpose building and to support tourism. Each gets 1
cent of the special sales tax. Included in the $8
million expenditure would be a fire station facility on the south side
of the city, a new pumper, several large pieces of equipment for the
street department and shop, improvements in the parks and addition of
parks, money to buy land, landscape, and improve drainage in a number
of areas, vehicles for police and building and grounds, and a $3
million thoroughfare project for West Boundary Extended and Mary Rhea
Drive. The $13.21 million would be for milling
and overlay of streets, repair of sidewalks and for additional new
sidewalks throughout the city. • DeBerry said the
plan “appears to be a substantial bite, but is needed for esthetic
purposes, as a recruitment tool, and for safety. “We
all know that has been a great concern of your constituents who ask,
‘When are you going to do something about streets, sidewalks, parks?’” •
Alderman Russell Johnson was concerned about performance on existing
projects such as the Chalmers Institute and Hill Crest Cemetery
improvement grants. But his greatest concern, he said, was to assess
where the city is with its current indebtedness before making any
decision on the mayor’s plan. • Alderman Calvin
James was concerned about damage being done by log trucks and other
truck traffic to the streets as they wind through the main city
thoroughfare -- Memphis and Craft streets. •
Alderman Johnnie Ree Bagley-Johnson was concerned with outstanding bond
indebtedness the city “will be paying on down the road.” She was
concerned the debt could be so great that the city would have
difficulty even paying the interest. • R. Johnson
wanted to know if the bonds would be purchased all at the same time or
would the bonds for street work be phased in. He didn’t think it would
be wise to have the bond money sitting there and wanted to know if the
city would be paying interest on it while it was waiting to be spent.
He also wanted to know if the city could invest the bond money and draw
interest while it awaited application to specific projects. •
DeBerry explained that he didn’t need a motion to engage in the bond
purchasing now but to initiate the project and begin moving it forward. Johnson
responded that the board needs to know the financial situation in the
city now, which includes paying off debt on the police station, and a
CAP loan on the south side of town, and with a short reserve of only
about $150,000. “Each year we move money out (of reserve) and never put money in,” he said. •
James asked what is the likelihood the Legislature would not approve a
local and private bill for an additional 1 cent sales tax. “It
would be putting the cart behind the horse,” he said, if the board
approved the plan without first getting the local and private bill
approved. “You can’t get permission to move
until you guys give me the permission to move,” the mayor replied. “The
Legislature will be in session in four months and we need to get this
before the budget committee soon.” • James wanted
to know what the city would have to pay interest on, and DeBerry said
only on the general obligation, combined utility project, or special
assessment bonds. DeBerry answered that he needed board approval in order to move forward on the concepts in the plan. “The
longer we wait, the more teeth we are going to have to pull,” he said,
using the metaphor of dentistry to illustrate his point. “There
is no way a community can sustain itself unless it invests in itself,”
he said. “There are some basic things we have to do, like places like
Tupelo have done. It’s not just about looking good. We’ve got some
serious liability out there and complaints about deplorable conditions,
breaking axles. We can’t continue to stand still. The cost is going up
and we have to deal with it. “We all have said we
will have to do something about the city. This is just capsulated and
the numbers were crunched by financial experts. Nothing will happen (in
the Legislature) before next July and so it is already 12 months down
the road.” • Alderman Garrie Colhoun wanted to
know where the city stands on existing projects and then clarified that
there are two big projects in the proposed initiative. “You add 13 and 8 and you got a pretty good chunk of change,” he said. He
said the life expectancy of a street before it needs maintenance is
seven years, whereas these proposed bonds may take 20 or 30 years to be
paid off. “Where is the money coming from to maintain the roads (after they are rebuilt)?” he asked. He added that the city is just losing a grocery store that pulled in sales taxes and property tax, too. DeBerry said the financial experts will be able to advise the city on tax revenues and if the bonds are feasible to pay off. • “I am in agreement we have to do something,” said James. “I just don’t want to make a complete commitment.” • Alderman Harvey Payne asked if the city has to pay the financial consultant who built the plan and crunched the numbers. DeBerry said the law firm gets no pay unless the projects are acted upon in the plan. Payne
said he thinks the 1 cent sales tax would be fair but he didn’t know if
he was in favor of $13 million in bonds and does not know how that
works. • Johnson asked to table the issue until the aldermen could learn more about it. “At what point will the citizens let us know ‘we don’t mind being taxed?’” he asked. Bagley asked for a list of the city’s bonded indebtedness. |