EPA’s attempt to side-step Congress U.S. Senator Roger F. Wicker Since
President Obama took office, the federal government has expanded at an
alarming rate. The failed stimulus and Obamacare are two prime
examples, but the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has also been
at the forefront of this effort. The EPA’s proposed policies could
lead to higher energy and food costs for all Americans and stifle
economic opportunity at a time when we should be promoting job creation. Preventing a New Energy Tax During
the last Congress, environmentalists proposed a tax on carbon known as
cap and trade to force Americans to use less energy. Because
electricity rates would have soared, I helped block efforts to impose
this tax. Now, the EPA wants to expand existing regulations and create
new barriers for domestic energy through administrative rules that
would side-step Congressional action. These rules amount to a backdoor
cap and trade scheme. Higher electricity rates
impact families and businesses alike. These costs would put U.S.
workers at a disadvantage to our overseas competitors who are not
subjected to the same energy costs and government regulations. The
level of federal overreach by the EPA is unprecedented in scope and
takes no consideration of how these newly imposed requirements will
impact jobs and the American economy. Clean Water Act Abuse In
addition to energy oversight, the EPA is also seeking greater
jurisdiction over waterways around the country. The agency wants to
classify small waterways and drainage ditches on farmland as “navigable
waters,” so it could regulate them. I recently joined other Senators in
writing to the EPA administrator questioning the agency’s new
interpretation of the Clean Water Act. This change, we wrote, “will
significantly expand federal control of private lands.” This
unnecessary expansion takes power away from states and could lead to an
increase in litigation for families and businesses. Other Attempts at Overreach The
EPA has also threatened to begin regulating dust generated by farming.
Farmers and ranchers would be forced to limit the effect of dust
created by their agricultural production, and communities could be
required to pave or treat dirt roads. Mississippi’s farmers are already
struggling with rising prices for fuel, feed, and
fertilizer. Unnecessary EPA regulations threaten to send costs even
higher. Unfortunately, the EPA is not the only
part of the Obama administration promoting more government
involvement. The President’s nominee for Commerce Secretary, John
Bryson, has advocated the national cap and trade energy tax and larger
federal role for industries. The primary mission of the Commerce
Department is to create jobs, but Mr. Bryson’s ideas could have the
opposite effect by adding burdensome red tape in this already fragile
economy. Limiting the Administration To
help stop this overreach, I have co-sponsored the Regulations from the
Executive in Need of Scrutiny (REINS) Act, which would require Congress
and the president to approve all new major rules before they can be
enforced. Major rules would be those that have an
annual economic impact of $100 million or more. Last year, 100 such
rules were finalized by the Executive Branch without Congressional
oversight. Preventing unnecessary and
burdensome regulations from going into effect is an important start to
reining in the EPA and the rest of the administration. I
will continue to oppose the dramatic expansion of power for the
Executive Branch and work to repeal much of what has already been
imposed. |