Supervisors debate sewer funding By SUE WATSON Staff Writer The
Marshall County Board of Supervisors approved a resolution recently
requesting the Mississippi Legislature pass a $1.1 million bond bill to
build the Cayce Road/Highway 72 sewer. The county will also work on a
back-up plan for funding through Rural Development. The county has about $900,000 in funding through the Appalachian Regional Commission and a Community Development Block Grant. The
project has been on the cutting board for several years but no progress
has been made because state funding was pulled on a portion of the
project and spent on other more pressing projects. Supervisors are
reticent to borrow money to build the sewer system because residents’
sewer bills would be exorbitant. If the bond
bill is not passed by the Legislature, the county may be able to get 75
percent of the money for the project through USDA-Rural Development.
But the costs of the remaining 25 percent would be paid either by the
customers or by county taxpayers. Supervisors
said they do not want all county taxpayers to have to pay for a sewer
system for just one area – and the bill would be too high for the
customers in the area – mostly tenants in two adjacent mobile home
parks. Marshall County IDA director Bill Mobley
said customers will be charged $25 a month just for the treatment of
the household sewage. Supervisor Keith Taylor believes $25 a month is about tops for what residents can afford to pay. IDA and Marshall County Utilities would be responsible for collecting for the sewer. Mobley said amortization to pay off the system, if money is borrowed, could run customers another $15 per household. “I am not going to vote for a $50 a month sewer bill,” Taylor said. He
argued that the State of Mississippi mandated the sewer be built and to
tack a $40 to $50 a month sewer bill on top of the household garbage
bill is too much. Supervisor Ronnie Joe Bennett
argued that the Environmental Protection Agency should have brought
forth some federal dollars for the project. Taylor and Bennett worried
the county could be liable for the construction cost in the end. Supervisor George Zinn III said IDA could benefit from future revenue if it were involved in servicing the debt. “Future revenue would be a long way off,” Mobley warned. Several
industrial and distribution companies were attracted to the Chickasaw
Trail Industrial Park because of the sewer, Mobley said. The sewer
would be extended to the trailer parks, said Kent Smith, county
attorney. He said the board room could be packed every Monday if
something is not done about it. “It ought to be packed now,” Mobley quipped. Smith said IDA has no financial obligation to the sewer project and therefore the county has no financial obligation. “Except if the county is responsible for grants and loans,” said Zinn. A
survey of residents initially indicated nearly all residents of the two
trailer parks wanted the sewer service and a more recent survey in
December last year indicated they still are interested, Mobley said. Smith
said the bond bill would not be binding and supervisors could reject
the bond money or the Rural Development funds if they see the customers
will be charged more than they can pay. The
taxpayers of Marshall County should not be obligated to pay for the
sewer and have not paid for the sewer in the Chickasaw Trail, Smith
said. “This board will have a final vote once we
know the final bill – whether it’s all paid from state and federal
money or if a percentage of the payback,” said Smith. “The board will
see the final bill to customers before it is passed.” County
consultant Gary Anderson reminded the board of supervisors that there
is no free money and whether the funding comes from the state or from
federal sources, the money ultimately comes out of taxpayers’ pockets. |