| Dillard, other assessors support tax relief bill By SUE WATSON Staff Writer Members
of the Mississippi Assessors/Collectors Association are urging the
public to contact their supervisors, representatives and senators
regarding a bill that died in the House of Representatives this session. It
would have increased the amount of special homestead exemption for
those 65 and over or who are disabled, according to tax assessor
Juanita Dillard. She said tax assessors are
hoping the House will muster the three-fifth’s vote needed to bring
HB1704 back up this legislative session. The Senate version of the
homestead bill, SB2061 and SB2300, passed this session. The association
is publicizing this issue with hope that the House will reconsider this
year, she said. For a second year in a row the
measure that would allow individuals 65 and over or disabled to not pay
property taxes on the first $100,000 in appraised value of their land
and home has failed to pass into law. Dillard
said the proposed raising of the existing exemption from $75,000 in
appraised value to $100,000 for those 65 and over or disabled is
critical for some homeowners who are living on limited incomes and
whose property was reappraised in 2008 at about 20 percent higher,
putting some individuals over the $75,000 exemption for the 2008 year. What
that means to the homesteader 65 and over or who is disabled is that
they either have to pay some property taxes, while they had not been
paying any, or their taxes went up substantially after the 2008
reappraisal, Dillard said. The legislation was particularly needed for
counties where reappraisals of property values was mandated by the
state Legislature last year, she said. That includes Marshall County. Had
the legislation passed, the number of applications for special
homestead exemption at the $100,000 cut-off would have increased from
3,330 to 3,352 this year in Marshall County, Dillard said. Each year
that the cap limit is not raised, more and more individuals reaching 65
or becoming disabled will be affected, she said. “For
many residents, their homestead credit stayed the same, their property
value increased and they are now having to pay more taxes but their
income has not increased,” Dillard said. In the
past, homesteaders have looked forward to getting property tax relief
at age 65 to help offset their declining income, she said. Individuals
who reach 65 by January 1 on any given year can apply for the special
exemption between January 1 and April 1 of the current year, Dillard
said. If a person reaches 65 or who is disabled does not apply for the
special exemption (pays no taxes on the first $75,000 in value of home
and land) at the tax assessor’s office, they are charged the regular
tax levy, she said. “The tax assessor’s office
does not know when a person reaches age 65 or becomes disabled and then
qualifies for the special tax exemption,” she said. Support publicized A press release by the Mississippi Assessors/Collectors Association clarifies the issue as the association sees it. “County
tax assessors and collectors are calling on legislative leaders to take
action this session to provide much needed tax relief to Mississippi’s
homeowners, particularly those over 65 or disabled,” said Jimmie Ladner
with the association. The legislation that could
have provided relief for homeowners over 65 passed by the Senate died
in the House of Representatives due to fierce opposition led by the
Mississippi Association of Supervisors (MAS), he said, although boards
of supervisors in 20 counties that reappraised property values this
year supported raising the homestead limits, he said. “Although
these counties were in support of relief for homeowners, the MAS
leadership led the fight to kill the legislation,” Ladner said. David
Melton, Grenada County assessor/collector and president of the
Assessors/Collectors Association stressed that every member of the
association has advocated for increasing the homestead exemption levels. “Raising
the homestead exemption levels is periodically necessary in order to
keep tax burdens from being shifted onto homeowners when property is
reassessed,” he said. “Without action from our state Legislature, we
are afraid some of our most vulnerable simply will not be able to pay
the increased taxes on their homes.” He supported
suspending the deadline rule so the House could reconsider the $100,000
homestead limit (add it back into the bill). The fact that a county reappraises its property periodically is not the issue, Ladner said. “The
issue arises when homestead exemption does not grow along with the
assessed values in a county,” he said. “If the Legislature fails to
increase homestead exemption levels as home values rise, what occurs is
a ‘shift’ of the county tax burden into single-family, owner-occupied,
class 1 property, that is the homeowners.” Ladner
is tax assessor/collector for Hancock County and has seen tragedy close
up and understands the issue of rising property taxes. “It
is hard enough to face my county’s taxpayers who have suffered so much
from recent storms (Katrina) but then to add to their horror story the
additional concerns of whether or not they will be able to pay their
taxes is simply not right,” he said. “It is time for all county
officials to consider its citizens, its elderly and its disabled first.
I fail to understand why any local elected official did not
whole-heartedly support this legislation.” Melton
said the association supports legislation that would increase the
homestead exemption levels in the same year that a county undergoes
reappraisal. “By doing it simultaneously, the
increased assessed values offset the additional exemption granted,” he
said. “Despite what the Mississippi Association of Supervisors may wish
you to believe, passing this measure will provide our elderly,
disabled, and struggling young families some property tax relief
without hurting the county one bit.” Dillard said
she “agrees wholeheartedly with Melton and Ladner” for the need for
legislation that would provide tax relief (homestead credit) especially
for the elderly and disabled. “It has been a deep
disappointment for me that this legislation did not pass,” she said. “I
was hopeful that this legislation would pass last year when we were
mandated to reappraise our county property. It was badly needed to
offset the increase in our property values. After the defeat of this
measure last year, many of our state legislators received calls
expressing the need for the increase in homestead credit. We were led
by them to believe it would pass, but once again it has failed.” Dillard
called for better communication and cooperation between all levels of
government inlcuding the State Tax Commission, concerning bills pending
in the Senate and House of Representatives and how they will affect
citizens at the county level. “Our senators and
representatives need to contact the local governing officials,
including the tax assessor and collector, when a bill is pending, to
see how that bill would impact their county,” she said. “One
organization pulling one way and another organization pulling the
opposite way is no way to look out for the best interests of the
citizens of this state. “Our citizens are suffering foreclosures, fixed incomes, no incomes, and now higher property taxes. There has to be a solution.” Ronnie
Joe Bennett, president of the Marshall County Board of Supervisors,
said he did not agree with the state association of supervisors
leadership on pulling the increased exemption (up to $100,000) for
seniors and the disabled out of the bill. “We
couldn’t afford to fight to keep the exemption at $75,000,” he said,
“as many people in Marshall County were affected. I look at it this
way, we haven’t been collecting taxes off these people whose property
was appraised at or below $75,000. So the county didn’t need the extra
taxes from them created by the reappraisal. And if the county hadn’t
had to do the reappraisal, their tax situation would not have changed. “I
had a guy come up to me and say he had not been paying any property
taxes and after the 2008 reappraisal he had to pay $147 a year. It is
people like him who needed the special homestead exemption for 65 and
over increased to $100,000.”
|